None of that will work because the liability/ideological pressure doesn't care about truth. It cares about subjective acceptable speech. Simple example: men ar

None of that will work because the liability/ideological pressure doesn't care about truth. It cares about subjective acceptable speech. Simple example: men are far more often the victim of violence compared to women. So the age old idea that women should be afraid to go out at night may be true, it is even more true for men. By your logic, this would afford more hate towards women, and less hate against men. This truth nor the outcome isn't acceptable as it doesn't fit the narrative. It would be rejected, diluted, there's a 100 tactics to undermine truth if you approach it in bad faith. Further, your approach of differentiation is inherently racist, sexist, etc or can be perceived as such. Giving special protections to identities also tends to humiliate them as you signal that they are "less". Inferior. Can't make it on their own. Or, the exact opposite: it can be weaponized. Collecting the labels like pokemons.