So, is your argument (or in fact, your intention) that some groups are especially sensitive, or need protection and cannot do that on their own and need a super

So, is your argument (or in fact, your intention) that some groups are especially sensitive, or need protection and cannot do that on their own and need a supervising authority to declare that they should get special protection? Who decides that <x> group is being harmed more? And by what measure? Or is the underlying principle that no one should be subject to speech that may demean them? This whole approach would seem to go against many of our principles of equality and freedom of speech.