As others have pointed out, neither of your contentions is supported by anything linked or in your comment. I see nothing that recommends libertarianism here.

As others have pointed out, neither of your contentions is supported by anything linked or in your comment. I see nothing that recommends libertarianism here. In a libertarian world IBM does not license DOS out of antitrust fears and Bill Gates and Paul Allen do not win the associated $100 billion lottery. The idea that Gates is the shining light that's allowed the world to have progress is even more laughable. The man was in the right place at the right time and milked his monopoly very successfully. That's been great for him and MS but in all likelihood has been to the detriment of the rest of the society. He's giving back a lot now and that's commendable but let's not get carried away.