4 ms·
You can see my other reply above if you care. But I do take issue with this >By any measure these two aren’t wealthy That's objectively so wrong. They are bas
by eatsyourtacos 4y ago
You can see my other reply above if you care. But I do take issue with this
>By any measure these two aren’t wealthy
That's objectively so wrong. They are basically set for life on money or will be before too long with more sales rolling in over time.
The vast majority of people will never see anywhere near that amount of money.. yet we don't want to call it wealthy. Ludicrous.
- dcow 4y agoThey don't have a lump 7MM sitting around and are most certainly not set for life. Someone else did the math and it comes out to 100k per person per year after taxes and fees. Do you want to reassess?