4 ms·
Curation is the answer. The more junk, the better off are the one curation for quality, relevancy and human interest.
by prox 4y ago
Curation is the answer. The more junk, the better off are the one curation for quality, relevancy and human interest.
- nextaccountic 4y agoCuration that tracks the provenance. If we receive a string of text by itself we can't do much about it. We need to know from where it came from, whether it was written by a human, etc
- dwallin 4y agoHuman provenance is less important than human curation here. AI can already infrequently output content that surpasses average human-generated quality in certain categories. As long as in the end you are checking that content exceeds an average bar of quality as assessed by human aesthetics, and ensuring that you have a diverse set of content (eg. not overrepresented by content that AI is particularly good or prolific at), it should still improve outcomes.
- nextaccountic 4y agoI still want to know if the content was written by an AI, because text quality (whatever that means) isn't the only metric humans care about.