That's the biggest thing that frustrates me about NWO (as a concept) used as a rhetorical device in argument: it's not necessary. You have world history litter

That's the biggest thing that frustrates me about NWO (as a concept) used as a rhetorical device in argument: it's not necessary. You have world history littered with examples of mass surveillance platforms being used for oppression. No explanation or justification of why that happens seems necessary! It's a stronger and supported argument to just say "Whatever the cause, when mass surveillance has been implemented historically, it is eventually used to errode civil liberties and increase population control."