3 ms·
Nick says he wasn't aware of a couple of tags. I think it's fair to assume there were tests, and plenty of them but a use case was overlooked. Which I think is
by jeffrydegrande 15y ago
Nick says he wasn't aware of a couple of tags. I think it's fair to assume there were tests, and plenty of them but a use case was overlooked. Which I think is perfectly reasonable. Automated tests don't catch what you don't know.
This doesn't say anything about 37s and how they work. I guess the only thing that matters is how much time it took for a fix to be deployed.
- sanderjd 15y agoIt is reasonable, and testing can't catch everything, but it does say something about them, though I don't think it's anything they wouldn't say about themselves - their top priority is not assuring quality, but assuring that quality lapses can be, and are, quickly rectified. That's fine, but it's not for every application or every team.