4 ms·

Be the biggest hypocrite possible seems to be his motto

• scotty79 4y ago
  "competition is for losers" is really honest and true. Nothing hypocritical about it.
  • rdedev 4y ago
    In that framing, everything else outside the company, like society, govt, are just losers. That's just a sad state to be in
    • scotty79 4y ago
      And yet that's exactly the state we are really in regardless of all declaration stating otherwise.
      • ngetchell 4y ago
        This is such a disgusting world-view. "Yes, the govt worker that helps run SNAP, so people can eat, is just a loser." Maybe they aren't looking to maximize the same things you are? You know, a different perspectives?
  • creshal 4y ago
    If companies own it up, sure. But Meta pretends to want "honest" competition, it's just that somehow any competitors who do exactly what Meta is doing are "cheating".
    • godzillabrennus 4y ago
      Congress might do something if they went full Martin Shkreli on what they are doing in Big Tech.
  • toss1 4y ago
    "Honest and true" IFF your sole interest is your monetary/political gain without regard to ethics or fairness — IOW, you are an abuser/exploiter of the system and of people. It is the same kind of "truth" as "Might Makes Right" and "He who has the gold makes the rules". While these phrases accurately describe the matter in some situations, they do not create a society that is sustainable, desirable, or any value of ethical (even for the abuser/autocrat, who must always watch their back). So, yes, to the extent that it is an open admission of being an abusive exploiter of the system and people, it is not hypocritical. But if that same person makes any statement or pretense that they are an ethical or good person, it is hypocritical in the extreme.
    • scotty79 4y ago
      > While these phrases accurately describe the matter in some situations, they do not create a society that is sustainable, desirable, or any value of ethical (even for the abuser/autocrat, who must always watch their back). It accurately describes our society that is not sustainable, desirable or ethical. Pretending that it is doesn't help us with evolving it towards some noble goals. To evolve the system you need to understand it. For example you can't progress society untill you understand that the one we got after thousands of years of societal evolution is the one entirely based on the concept of monopoly for violence. Some people feel very offended about this. I have exactly zero hopes for their revolutionary attempts at transformation working out.
      • toss1 4y ago
        >>It accurately describes our society that is not sustainable, desirable or ethical. Spot on! However it is not all black & white, but a gradient of high trust to almost zero trust. For example, the US is definitely degrading in the last decade, but is still nowhere near the levels of endemic and systematic paranoia of Russia or North Korea. It all comes down to this: if you want to live a self-determined life in a society with a self-determined government, you must personally and as a nation be better armed, prepared, and allied than the abusers and autocrats who want to steal from you and rule you. Giving the equivalent of nukes to the abusers/autocrats is not a smart move.
  • JohnFen 4y ago
    Honest? Sure. True? No.
  • dgb23 4y ago
    In isolation maybe? I heard him claim that he is a "libertarian" once.