I understand your point 1) The main thing of brexit was to "take back control" away from "unelected EU officials" and allow debates by elected officials in Par

I understand your point 1) The main thing of brexit was to "take back control" away from "unelected EU officials" and allow debates by elected officials in Parliament. (british laws for british people) 2) Then the second overtone was stopping or lowering migration, but that was implied. 3) Thirdly was the money aspect, that we would have more money to make public services better. on point 1, we have more statutory instruments now, which allows secretaries of state to change laws at will, without debate. This is a direct betrayal, and something that could have been avoided, but required consensus (which doesn't exist on either side of the debate). We are still pumping out shit laws that people don't like. point 2, immigration hasn't come down: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/longterminternationalmigrationprovisional/yearendingjune2022 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populati... but the focus has shifted from "them bloody poles" to boats. on point 3, well just look at the place. Its not exactly improved. Now, this isn't actually to do with brexit, its government mismanagement.