5 ms·
> > it WILL be developed no matter how much people wish it wouldn't. > Sure, but there's a value in delaying that development. Delaying harm is a valid tactic.
by x-complexity 4y ago
> > it WILL be developed no matter how much people wish it wouldn't.
> Sure, but there's a value in delaying that development. Delaying harm is a valid tactic.
It is a horrible tactic when your adversary has ultra-deep pockets & mountains of bodies to throw at the problem.
Whatever's being developed here has 1/10th the capability of the tech being developed in black site facilities at the behest of national militaries.
- jevgeni 4y agoWhich are blocked from pulling from Github?
- x-complexity 4y ago> Which are blocked from pulling from Github? In the case that they're blocked: They'd only need one unrestricted computer to pull their libraries into & subsequently copy that onto siloed off workstations. It's not like anyone will actually care to notice. In the case that they aren't blocked: Business as usual.
- jevgeni 4y agoExactly.
- UncleEntity 4y agoYou really think the government sponsored projects are subject to bans on downloading stuff from GitHub?
- jevgeni 4y agoAre we in a rhetorical question competition? :)
- The_Colonel 4y ago> Whatever's being developed here has 1/10th the capability of the tech being developed in black site facilities at the behest of national militaries. Debatable at least in case of smaller dictatorships like North Korea, Eritrea, Qatar ...