2 ms·
> My point is that it makes little effort to distinguish this high quality scholarship and complete nonsense. You make such sweeping claims based on a sample s
by uoaei 4y ago
> My point is that it makes little effort to distinguish this high quality scholarship and complete nonsense.
You make such sweeping claims based on a sample size of one. You neglect to account for survivorship bias -- you cannot see all the bullshit papers that were rejected from journals. This all feels obvious to me as issues with your analysis. Where is your intellectual rigor?
- Aunche 4y agoNot a sample size of one. Out of 20 papers they published, 7 got accepted, 6 were rejected, and 7 were still undergoing review. Also, I don't think that paper is that different from the postmodernist literature that I've read. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair