14 ms·
I don't really see the issue. You are using a service called GhostWrite which uses ChatGPT under the hood. OpenAI/ChatGPT would be considered a sub-processor of
by billythemaniam 4y ago
I don't really see the issue. You are using a service called GhostWrite which uses ChatGPT under the hood. OpenAI/ChatGPT would be considered a sub-processor of GhostWrite. What am I missing?
- hgsgm 4y agoOn properly designed privacy respecting systems, the client sends the request to the trusted server with whatever API keys are needed to make it work. But that would break the server lock-in subscript model, so only downloadable software would work.
- aeonflux 4y agoHow are they using ChatGPT - is there an API? Or is this simply abuse of TOS?
- LeoPanthera 4y agoThey're not using ChatGPT, they're using GPT-3, which has an API. There is a ChatGPT API coming but it's not available yet. It is infuriating how everyone is describing all GPT models as "ChatGPT". It's very misleading.
- chewmieser 4y agoSupposedly there is a hidden model that you can use via the API that actually is ChatGPT. One of the libraries mentioned in these comments is using it. Edit: this one https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/chatgpt-api https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/chatgpt-api
- geekrax 4y agoIn case anyone wants to replace davinci-003 with the chat GPT model, the name is `text-chat-davinci-002-20230126`
- alias1 4y agoSeems this leaked ChatGPT API model got taken down already.. https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/issues/523 https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/issues/523 https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/issues/523#issuecomment-14145246 https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/issues/523#issuecomment...