3 ms·
Old Gawker had plenty of flaws and probably deserved the beating it got, but at least it was a unique thing. New Gawker had absolutely nothing special about it
by Analemma_ 4y ago
Old Gawker had plenty of flaws and probably deserved the beating it got, but at least it was a unique thing. New Gawker had absolutely nothing special about it and no reason to exist. It was a cookie-cutter celebrity gossip rag using the old site’s name. There’s nothing even worth noting here.
- DoItToMe81 4y agoGawker was always a cookie-cutter celebrity gossip rag. It might have the least value to mankind of any mainstream publication I've seen.