3 ms·

All those models are only as good as the data they’re trained on. Google and Meta both have the most relevant proprietary data that cannot be rivaled. Not even

by lvl102 4y ago

All those models are only as good as the data they’re trained on. Google and Meta both have the most relevant proprietary data that cannot be rivaled. Not even close.

vernon99 4y ago
This depends on what are you training the model for. Arguably wikipedia is a much better dataset for all things related to real world and history than Fb’s feed or activities or a bunch of websites optimized for SEO. This is easily illustrated by ChatGPT not being Google or Meta and doing a pretty great job with available sources. So no, this doesn’t matter much, imo.
- roland35 4y ago
  As an encyclopedia sure wikipedia is great but the type of data Google and Meta has is totally different. Basically a real time feed of who is talking to who about what, and what people are searching for. Totally different applications
- lvl102 4y ago
  That’s incredibly naive. ChatGPT is not the state of the art. Not even close.
kibwen 4y ago
> All those models are only as good as the data they’re trained on. Having seen the average level of discourse on Facebook, I have no reason to believe that it contains any proprietary data worth training on.
- coffeebeqn 4y ago
  I guess you could train the ultimate toxic shitposter and then do the opposite of what it says