3 ms·

Unless you want to count Java as clunky? Well, I definitely think Java is clunky. This article by Steve Yegge, titled "Execution in the Kingdom of Nouns" sums

• DarkNova6 4y ago
  ... this PDF is from 2006, the same year that Java 6 was released. Java 7 and Java 8 were game-changers at their time. I doubt there is much relevance left, especially in light of Java's excellent functional integration into its type system and JVM. Edit: ``` There's no reason Java couldn't simply add first-class functions and finally enter the grown-up, non-skewed world that allows people to use verbs as part of their thought processes ``` Ironically, this is exactly what happened. With exception that proper technological implementation took many years and might have one of the best implementations for anonymous functions out of any programming language (thank you, dynamic JVM).
  • za3faran 4y ago
    Don't forget the many additional features since then, such as records, pattern matching, virtual threads, and more.