4 ms·
> Apparently, both companies cared. Cared deeply. Hence the coordinated firing. Seems like collusion, wage suppression, interference with business and interfer
by ijustcantevenw 4y ago
> Apparently, both companies cared. Cared deeply. Hence the coordinated firing.
Seems like collusion, wage suppression, interference with business and interference with employment. I hope this guy sues the crap out of OP's company.
> If an employee says he's pulling 40h/week but he's actually pulling around 20h/week, if that, then the question of fraud is up.
If an employee is getting 40 hours of work done per week, then I don't see the problem.
> If this was supposed to be a non-issue, why go through so much trouble to hide it?
Because it's none of their business.
- simplotek 4y ago> Seems like collusion (...) It's as much collusion as it would be if two victims of fraud agreed to go together to the police to press charges. > If an employee is getting 40 hours of work done per week, then I don't see the problem. You're not. > Because it's none of their business. What they put in the contract is unequivocally their business, don't you think?
- ijustcantevenw 4y ago> You're not. I'm the most productive engineer on both of my teams and have been for the 4 years I've been working at both companies. I don't tell them. Nor do I tell them about my sexual proclivities, my rental income, my residuals on several albums I produced nor my stock, crypto and portfolio income. I manage all of that a little bit of "company time", whatever that means. > What they put in the contract is unequivocally their business, don't you think? No. We are forced to sign a ton of unfair contracts just for the privilege of working our asses off to make other people rich.
- mirekrusin 4y agoIn this case it evolved to more like 0-3h max per week.