3 ms·
Oh geez. It's Internet Explorer CSS Behaviors all over again. "Those who do not learn from the past…"
by ttfkam 4y ago
Oh geez. It's Internet Explorer CSS Behaviors all over again.
"Those who do not learn from the past…"
- c-smile 4y agoClose but not exactly, there is no esoteric HTC stuff for example. element.selector { prototype: ClassName url(in-module.js); color: blue; ... } That above is significantly better than almost-dead-at-birth WebComponents: let customElementRegistry = window.customElements; customElementRegistry.define('my-custom-element', MyCustomElement); One simple CSS property instead of 20+ additional entities https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Web_Components https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Web_Components Used quite a lot actually, on half of machines where Sciter is installed (~500..600 mln machines :)
- earthboundkid 4y agoWeb Components is a marketing coup. It’s a great name. People wish it existed and did the thing it says. So they ignore that customElement and shadow DOM are two terrible APIs that are best ignored by 99% of developers… Meanwhile, shit that would actually help framework authors, like native morphDOM don’t happen.