> That's because Qt 6 wholeheartedly converted to CMake for you. It's not Qt6. The same goes for Qt5, which has been around for what, close to a decade? And w

> That's because Qt 6 wholeheartedly converted to CMake for you. It's not Qt6. The same goes for Qt5, which has been around for what, close to a decade? And what's your point, exactly? That things are hard if you purposedly ignore all the examples that prove that things are patently easy and trivial? Because it seems evident to me that if you want to quickly setup a C++ project to try out stuff, a CMake project with single-digit lines of code that get you a window with an OpenGL context going is right what you'd be looking for. But instead you complain that the choice of build system and framework made things easy? And that's why things are not hard What exactly do you think is your point?