3 ms·
> I would've thought a larger fleet of smaller planes would be less efficient because it increases operational cost and you have more overhead weight to move ar
by sofixa 4y ago
> I would've thought a larger fleet of smaller planes would be less efficient because it increases operational cost and you have more overhead weight to move around.
You'd be wrong. Airline bosses (Willie Walsh? Almost sure it was him) have said it literally costs less to have two 787 fly one after the other than a single A380. The fuel efficiency of twin engine planes compared to 3 or 4 older engines compensates for the lower capacity.
- wkat4242 4y agoBut the 4-engined models can fly more direct routes over oceans and uninhabited areas right? Because of ETOPS. Of course this is not a problem on many routes.
- mulmen 4y agoETOPS is what allows twins to fly routes that would otherwise require trijets or four engines. I'm not sure what the limits are but flights to Hawaii for example are routinely done with twins.
- wkat4242 4y agoI know, but as far as I know it requires them to stay with 200nm or so of an airport. So they can't take the most direct route. Also for flights over the poles. I think four engines still have a benefit there. But I guess you don't run a whole airplane model just because it's not economical on 2 or 3 routes.
- mulmen 4y agoI have personally flown from Seattle to Hawaii on a 737 MAX. That is 2320nmi. So no, the ETOPS limit is not 200nmi. There's nothing between the west coast and Hawaii but water. You can see AS853 is a nearly straight line from Seattle to Honolulu. If any of that deviation is for ETOPS it is minor. ETOPS is time based, not distance based. The 777 has been approved by the FAA for ETOPS-330, which is 330 minutes of flight time to the nearest airport on one engine. The 737 MAX is ETOPS-180, so it only has to be within 3 hours of a suitable airport when running on one engine. https://flightaware.com/live/airport_status_bigmap.rvt?airport=PHNL https://flightaware.com/live/airport_status_bigmap.rvt?airpo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETOPS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETOPS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/as853#2ef8bfcb https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/as853#2ef8bfcb
- Armisael16 4y agoThe 787 has a 330 minute ETOPS certification, so as long as it’s within 6.5 hours of an airport it can fly there. That’s almost everywhere on the planet except the South Pacific and Antarctica.