4 ms·

> In general the $35-70 SBCs (when they could be bought in retail) reveal an ugly truth: circa 99% of users don't ever need more than that in processing power/m

> In general the $35-70 SBCs (when they could be bought in retail) reveal an ugly truth: circa 99% of users don't ever need more than that in processing power/memory, even disk space with all the clouds for everything, hence all the $1,000+ machines (laptops, desktops, tablets, smartphones) are just massive overkill and a terrible waste. I suspect that quite a bit more than 1% of users play graphics heavy games or otherwise tax their machine beyond the practical limit of a cheap ARM SBC. If you'd said 2/3, I'd be much more inclined to agree.

ly3xqhl8g9 4y ago
True, however it is going to be harder and harder to pay $2,000+ for a top GPU to play the latest AAA game, and it is going to easier and easier to pay ~$10/month for a cloud-rendered gaming subscription. Stadia was just cursed for being a non-ads-based Google product, GeForce Now seems to be thriving [1]. Somewhat funny is that the top 2 and 3 PC games most popular in 2022 have 1993 graphics, Minecraft and Roblox [2]. Another list puts Minecraft on 4 and Roblox on 3 [3]. [1] August 2022, GeForce Now Surpasses 20 Million Registered Users, https://gfnsource.com/article/218/GeForce-NOW-Surpasses-20-Million-Registered-Users https://gfnsource.com/article/218/GeForce-NOW-Surpasses-20-M... [2] https://activeplayer.io/top-15-most-popular-pc-games-of-2022/ https://activeplayer.io/top-15-most-popular-pc-games-of-2022... [3] https://twinfinite.net/2022/10/most-played-games/ https://twinfinite.net/2022/10/most-played-games/