Yes, the issue is that they don't actually pick up the book. Their experience of the real world is too limited to have valid inferences. The same way a human b

Yes, the issue is that they don't actually pick up the book. Their experience of the real world is too limited to have valid inferences. The same way a human being born without any sense but hearing wouldn't be able to interact fully with the physical world and infer things about it. Basically, what I mean is that for now, unsupervised data acquisition is limited for AI. So it lacks "common sense" if you will. I don't think we really disagree anyway, that's probably just semantics.