4 ms·
Super excited and wait-listed. ChatGPT is likely to be the future - at least for certain applications - and I want to support it getting there. I had a convers
by bun_at_work 4y ago
Super excited and wait-listed. ChatGPT is likely to be the future - at least for certain applications - and I want to support it getting there.
I had a conversation with a friend about how much I would pay for this service and $20 is only a little more expensive than my response at the time. I think it will improve massively over time, and I'm here for it.
The current product is lacking a bit and can feel a bit hand-holdy when asking controversial questions, but that's probably good, considering the damage simple bots on social media can do to democracy. If the hand-holding allows me to get concise (if sometimes inaccurate) and fast answers to questions you can't ask a traditional search engine, it's worth a lot. It will be worth even more when it can provide sources for answers, or references to where the answers have been synthesized from.
- kensai 4y agoThey should just build in Asimov’s rules, and perhaps some extra ones to keep lawyers pleased. But only the minimum possible.
- flangola7 4y agoAsimov's rules are not nearly comprehensive enough for a number of reasons. Don't forget they were written to tell a fictiona story, not as practical advice. AI alignment is a hard problem.