5 ms·
> DCMS) had decided to give £12m of grant funding, which Tech Nation had relied on, to Barclays Bank That is absolutely wild.. 12m to a bank surely is pocket c
by bilekas 4y ago
> DCMS) had decided to give £12m of grant funding, which Tech Nation had relied on, to Barclays Bank
That is absolutely wild.. 12m to a bank surely is pocket change. What possible justification did they give for that?
They gave the funds instead to Barclays incubator who is a for profit organization.
Meaning they will simply push and invest in what is currently making money and not unproven technologies and sciences.
This won't end well long term i feel.
- WaxProlix 4y agoI mean, this is contemporary UK politics in a nutshell. Decades of tory (and tory light) rule have gutted programs in search of short-term benefit for ages, we'll see how the country fares but it's not looking pretty.
- gumby 4y agoConsider Sunak’s background.
- toyg 4y agoConsider the background of 99% of his party, rather. These decisions are not taken one by one at the top. And this happened in September, under the previous cabbage. Tories be tories.
- gadders 4y agoThat sounds.. racist. What relevance is the fact that he's of Indian ancestory?
- triceratops 4y agoI think they meant his background as an investment banker.
- gadders 4y agoBarclays made £7b profit last year. Nobody would be stupid enough to claim that the prime minister personally stepped in to get them another £12m (which they will have to give away in grants).
- gumby 4y agoYes I am pretty sure he never thought "Aha, Barclay's needs £12MM", or even noticed. My point is that he is a perfect synecdoche for his party: reflexively help establishment business and the donor class; ignore the small stuff that could grow large. And cutting anything that encourages immigration is important to the BREXIT wing of his party (which may be all that is left of it).
- triceratops 4y agoIt's natural to feel fondness or bias towards one's "own" industry. They're "your" people, you know the field well and can evaluate who's genuine and who isn't. You might believe that it's a force for good in the world. You probably still have friends or professional contacts in the industry.
- _joel 4y agoHe worked in a parmacy and his father's a doctor... as he likes to parrot.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- stuaxo 4y agoCompletely and utterly on brand for the Tories.
- kurthr 4y agoSomebody's gotta hire them when they leave office... might as well be a bank!
- kmlx 4y ago> That is absolutely wild.. 12m to a bank surely is pocket change. What possible justification did they give for that? “Our decision to make the Digital Growth Grant competitive brings the funding into line with the majority of government grants. Barclays Eagle Labs was successful because their application represented the best value for taxpayers’ money, will benefit the most startups and scaleups over the next two years, and was scored highest by an independent panel.”
- logifail 4y ago> That is absolutely wild.. 12m to a bank surely is pocket change. What possible justification did they give for that? I'm no huge fan of Barclays bank (bad experience several decades ago, vowed to never touch them again), but they aren't "giving the money to the bank", it sounds like Barclays is taking over the contract to provide the service.
- madeofpalk 4y agoArticle says this is not the case > [Barclays] will not, however, take over Tech Nation’s role administering the UK’s global talent visa. Tech Nation has notified the UK’s Home Office that its visa scheme will stop — though it will continue until then. Kind of weird that Tech Nation is notifying the government that a visa program will stop. Does Home Office intend for another org to take over the role of administering tech applicants for the Extraordinary/Global Talent visa?
- logifail 4y ago> Article says this is not the case "the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) put Tech Nation’s contract up for grabs after growing concerned about its reliance on state money"[0] "Barclays’ tech incubator Eagle Labs will use the government grant — which has been awarded for just two years — to launch new programmes to help tech companies"[1] Q: In what sense did Tech Nation "administer" the global talent visa? It seems to be at https://www.gov.uk/global-talent https://www.gov.uk/global-talent - what did Tech Nation have to do with this? [0] https://sifted.eu/articles/barclays-tech-nation-grant-fintech/ https://sifted.eu/articles/barclays-tech-nation-grant-fintec... [1] https://sifted.eu/articles/tech-nation-shutting-down/ https://sifted.eu/articles/tech-nation-shutting-down/
- madeofpalk 4y agoI have this visa, I've been through this process back when it was called Extraordinary Talent. To get the visa you must first get an endorsement from a nominated organisation who's fit to judge your field (academia or research, arts and culture, or digital technology). Tech Nation did the endorsements for digital technology. Once you have the endorsement from Tech Nation, the actual visa application done by Home Office is rather simple and is just 'rubber stamping' back in your home country.
- r00fus 4y agoIsn't this a clear-cut example of pure corruption? Who got that kickback to move moneys from a non-profit to a for-profit endeavor?
- unity1001 4y ago> Isn't this a clear-cut example of pure corruption? You mistyped 'Tories'. Not that the Tory-lites (the other party) is any better.
- Neil44 4y agoThere's more info in the FT article - https://www.ft.com/content/93abf2e2-d484-4edc-b5c9-30999a18b234 https://www.ft.com/content/93abf2e2-d484-4edc-b5c9-30999a18b... The short version is that Barclays Eagle Labs project represented better value for the taxpayer because Barclays absorb the operational costs leaving the taxpayer's 12M to go wholly towards it's intended target. Tech Nation used some of the 12M to run it's self.