4 ms·
Agreed and I’d go a step further and say that this was inevitable with the advent of JavaScript. Humans are lazy (efficient?) and will always gravitate to the
by rubicon33 4y ago
Agreed and I’d go a step further and say that this was inevitable with the advent of JavaScript.
Humans are lazy (efficient?) and will always gravitate to the easiest tool for the job. If “the job” is just to make a functional chat app, it becomes wildly efficient to simply wrap your web app in electron.
I’ve done it to an existing web app and it took less than a day to suddenly have “native” .dmg and .exe to distribute.
So when we yarn for the days of IRC, I think we should also yarn for the days when JavaScript was not the de facto language for everything which lowers the bar for development so incredibly low that you are ending up with truly garbage desktop apps that should be written in native windows SDK using C++.
- foverzar 4y agoJavaScript isn't bad. But if only it were used with native toolkits, instead of running a whole browser instance.
- furyofantares 4y agoAlright so I gotta ask, now that two people are saying they yarn for the days of IRC. I thought maybe it was a different idiom I was missing, but searching for "idiom yarn for" doesn't get me anywhere. Just a typo/misspelling of "yearn"?
- mnw21cam 4y agoSounds like a fairly good yarn to me.
- deafpolygon 4y agoSome HNers are secretly cats.