3 ms·
The discussion about alternatives doesn't need to be related to switching under the timeline of a routine security release, right? I would say that every securi
by dochtman 4y ago
The discussion about alternatives doesn't need to be related to switching under the timeline of a routine security release, right? I would say that every security release would increase activation energy to switch to another provider, even if that happens asynchronously relative to addressing the security release.
Assuming that good alternatives are available of course. (I'm a rustls maintainer, so obviously I think that's a pretty good alternative -- we have a C FFI, too!)
- some_furry 4y ago> The discussion about alternatives doesn't need to be related to switching under the timeline of a routine security release, right? If not, it certainly doesn't belong in a thread about an announcement for an upcoming security release. Maybe it'd make sense in the postmortem threads?
- Arnavion 4y agoFeel free to flag those comments and find out how many other people agree with you.