> This is like saying "weight loss has only one priority; eat less food and exercise more". I think this is far more reasonable. Want to weigh less? Eat a bi

> This is like saying "weight loss has only one priority; eat less food and exercise more". I think this is far more reasonable. Want to weigh less? Eat a bit less, move a bit more. OP said eliminate all carbon emissions. That's like starving to lose weight. A good compromise is "emit a little less, plant a few more trees" or something along those lines, which is basically what we're doing. We already know it won't be enough to avoid consequences, as those are already manifesting, but it's the most realistic path forward by far.