4 ms·
Most of the reaction you see from this are to the tune of "The AI people lied to us, the model DOES remember all of the images you train it on, here's proof in
by alexb_ 4y ago
Most of the reaction you see from this are to the tune of "The AI people lied to us, the model DOES remember all of the images you train it on, here's proof in that you can get the images back!".
When in reality, you absolutely cannot store data to reproduce every image it's trained on because the model isn't big enough to hold even a fraction of what it's trained on.
- tsukikage 4y agoSome. Some images back. I've not seen anyone claim anything like what you suggest. Do you have an example? I mean, it literally says "some" right there in the title, and if you click through and actually read the paper you see it's a tiny proportion.
- ForestCritter 4y agohttps://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/ai-generated-art-consent-1.6722981 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/ai-generated-art-cons... Here is a real world example.
- tsukikage 4y agoThat article, much like the OP, is about someone that found a few specific images were recoverable. I see no claim there that all images are. Am I missing something?
- ForestCritter 4y agoPopular artists are being requested and the AI is turning out their work. Suffice that you are well known so that people request you and your style is distinctive then your work will likely turn up. That ups the odds quite a bit.
- BoiledCabbage 4y ago> Most of the reaction you see from this are to the tune of "The AI people lied to us, the model DOES remember all of the images you train it on, here's proof in that you can get the images back!". You make a claim that seems trivially false. Cite some example comments to back it up.