Come on man, this isn't the first time you've tried to weigh in the case and consider your self an expert in the law only to be proven to be embarrassingly wron

Come on man, this isn't the first time you've tried to weigh in the case and consider your self an expert in the law only to be proven to be embarrassingly wrong. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34089507 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34089507 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34089879 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34089879 There is no overreach here, his agreement lays out who he can and can't contact without lawyers being present. His former employees are very clearly not to be contacted as they will certainly be witnesses in his case. This isn't some rule they made up for SBF, this is how every court case works. Why are you constantly shilling, and very incorrectly at that, for SBF all the time? If he really wanted to reach out as a friend then he could have done so on the record via his lawyer as the law allows for.