It’s not interesting or complicated in any way: because a non-human has no free will and is operated by a human, the human (or in this case OpenAI/Microsoft/etc

It’s not interesting or complicated in any way: because a non-human has no free will and is operated by a human, the human (or in this case OpenAI/Microsoft/etc.) is ultimately infringing. If and when the non-human is granted human rights, this can be revisited.