4 ms·
All the examples of bad interactions are from Cruise, not Waymo. So maybe restrict Cruise? Or allow expansion only for companies that show excellency? In my op
by henearkr 4y ago
All the examples of bad interactions are from Cruise, not Waymo.
So maybe restrict Cruise? Or allow expansion only for companies that show excellency? In my opinion that would be a shame to prevent good implementations from being used because of the existence of bad implementations from competitors.
- kotaKat 4y agoI think the bigger concern here is how fast and loose GM/Cruise got approval to run all this alongside deploying Super Cruise to normal customers in their normal vehicles. I reaaaaaaally don't trust GM's autonomous literally anywhere seeing the Cruise debacle. But hey, they're the American carmaker, so they got a free pass from the government to run wreckfully.
- xnx 4y agoIt's annoying in self driving artcles to see Cruise and Tesla grouped together with Waymo. The authors either dont realize how far ahead Waymo is or think it would somehow be improper to point it out.
- jjulius 4y ago>All examples of bad interactions are from Cruise, not Waymo In this article, sure. However, Waymo is certainly not without incident in SF, especially recently (article below is from 1/24/23)... >A Waymo autonomous vehicle was apparently stopped in the middle of a key San Francisco intersection, bringing traffic to a halt during morning rush hour. https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/waymo-rush-hour-traffic-standstill-17739556.php https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/waymo-rush-hour-traff...