3 ms·
The post mentions that Google was violating their T&Cs: When we started this investigation, I thought that we’d catch a rogue call-centre employee, point out t
by jontas 15y ago
The post mentions that Google was violating their T&Cs:
When we started this investigation, I thought that we’d catch a rogue call-centre employee, point out to Google that they were violating our Terms and conditions (sections 9.12 and 9.17, amongst others), someone would get a slap on the wrist, and life would continue.
- URSpider94 15y agoNO. The post says that, -if- Google is doing what someone pretending to be Google is apparently doing, then Google would be violating its own T&C's. Please read carefully so as not to turn a hypothetical statement into an inaccurate fact.
- ceol 15y agoNot to get too far off-topic, but you're doing the exact same thing: > -if- Google is doing what someone pretending to be Google is apparently doing We don't know if it was Google or someone pretending to be Google. However, to make jontas's statement neutral: > The post mentions that the alleged Google team was violating their T&Cs:
- jontas 15y agoYou are correct that it is all hypothetical based on who is responsible. However, you are incorrect that this is related in any way to Google's own T&Cs. The post links to the Mocality T&C page and says whoever is responsible is violating the sections mentioned in the paragraph I quoted above.