2 ms·
Land ownership need not equal building ownership. The two can be in the separate hands and there are indeed buildings where that is the case.
by anticensor 4y ago
Land ownership need not equal building ownership. The two can be in the separate hands and there are indeed buildings where that is the case.
- refuse 4y agoSure but in doing so you've stiffed the people least able to fight it. They don't treat businesses or the middle and upper classes like this because they'd fuck the county 23 different ways in court. Essentially it's a slow-acting imminent domain without compensation.
- anticensor 4y agoSuch an arrangement is not unlawful though. In fact, it can even be in two (or three even! ) different private entities: one for the land, one for the building, one for the unit ownership and and then the final tenant of the unit.