3 ms·
It does presume there is someone, or some group, keeping track of the tally on at least a weekly basis. If no one is keeping track of who is doing well and who
by MichaelZuo 4y ago
It does presume there is someone, or some group, keeping track of the tally on at least a weekly basis.
If no one is keeping track of who is doing well and who to replace, then fixing that first is more important.
- Karellen 4y agoWell, there's supposed to be a group keeping track of the alerts about anyone who is doing badly, but one of them is ignoring 90% of their alerts, another 95%, and another 100%. It's OK though, because the system is built to handle that kind of problem - by keeping a paper trail of who is to blame. Marvellous. :-)
- MichaelZuo 4y agoIf the organization is so large that it needs even the tracking group to have its own internal hierarchy then I'm afraid my wisdom is lacking.