4 ms·
caldecott and hi-rise near freeways sounds like viable options. you make it sound like it is a bad thing.
by egberts1 4y ago
caldecott and hi-rise near freeways sounds like viable options.
you make it sound like it is a bad thing.
- genocidicbunny 4y agoHousing right next to highways is pretty bad. There's a huge amount of pollution, both particulate and noise, and depending on the layout, also light. Constant exposure to all of those will quickly lead to a variety of chronic conditions and generally make one miserable.
- frankthedog 4y agoYou’re right, better have none at all than something below your standards. /s
- mikebenfield 4y agoBut the alternative isn’t none at all. The alternative is putting them somewhere better.
- frankthedog 4y agoWhy not both?
- genocidicbunny 4y agoThat's what HCD is trying to enforce -- that cities aren't just putting all the low-income housing in undesirable areas but are instead spreading it throughout.
- matt_heimer 4y agoIt isn't horrible but I don't think you can argue that it'd be better to put the high-rises near the Caltrain stations. If you don't then you are just requiring people to have cars which also makes it harder to afford the housing.
- kevinburke 4y agoYou can read our letter about the Caldecott site - it's in a fire zone, there are no amenities, utilities would likely need to be pulled across the freeway and active BART line. Near the freeway and in walking distance of downtown is one story, near the freeway and next to absolutely nothing else is another. https://eastbayforeveryone.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2023-01-31-orinda-fourth-draft.pdf https://eastbayforeveryone.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/20...