3 ms·

Oh, well thats where the confusion is. I didn't forget anything. Maybe I didn't make this clear enough, but my only interest in this thread was responding to th

Oh, well thats where the confusion is. I didn't forget anything. Maybe I didn't make this clear enough, but my only interest in this thread was responding to this: > The vaccine is known to prevent infections, just not 100%. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34551224/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34551224/ Which is a kind of odd statement in 2023. It's currently known to slow down infections a little bit, nowhere near 100% even at it's best. Times change and we have to keep up with them. Something that you thought you knew in 2021 isn't necessarily going to apply two years later. The study I posted about myocarditis is just to show that there at least exists evidence to the contrary of what tfa is saying. I can't say which one wins, just that they both exist. Edit: totally reasonable not to believe me. Maybe Bill Gates from a year ago can convince you: https://youtube.com/shorts/LfbYSbPF9uU?feature=share https://youtube.com/shorts/LfbYSbPF9uU?feature=share

lern_too_spel 4y ago
> I didn't forget anything You certainly forgot my explanation of the quote you were responding to. I never claimed it was near 100%. I merely said it was between 0 and 100%. The only one confused here is you, who seems to be confusing yourself deliberately. > I can't say which one wins The AHA can. > Maybe Bill Gates from a year ago can convince you As you keep confusing yourself into misunderstanding, Gates is saying nothing different from what I had claimed but something entirely different from what the person I responded to had claimed. Good job using a video with a vaccine conspiracy theory title though. No wonder you're so confused.
- ifyoubuildit 4y ago
  You said "it's just not 100%". I guess I must just be confusing myself into thinking that is misleading. What a silly vaccine conspiracy theorist I am. You're a really good troll btw, just not 100%.
  - lern_too_spel 4y ago
    I explained that earlier. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34570467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34570467 Are you seriously unable to remember? If I say vaccines prevent infection, a vaccine conspiracy theorist will say, "B-b-but my friend got vaccinated, and she still got infected." That's why I added that qualification, not to say it is near 100%. That's on you and your silly vaccine conspiracy theory interpretations.

lern_too_spel 4y ago

> I didn't forget anything You certainly forgot my explanation of the quote you were responding to. I never claimed it was near 100%. I merely said it was between 0 and 100%. The only one confused here is you, who seems to be confusing yourself deliberately. > I can't say which one wins The AHA can. > Maybe Bill Gates from a year ago can convince you As you keep confusing yourself into misunderstanding, Gates is saying nothing different from what I had claimed but something entirely different from what the person I responded to had claimed. Good job using a video with a vaccine conspiracy theory title though. No wonder you're so confused.

ifyoubuildit 4y ago
You said "it's just not 100%". I guess I must just be confusing myself into thinking that is misleading. What a silly vaccine conspiracy theorist I am. You're a really good troll btw, just not 100%.
- lern_too_spel 4y ago
  I explained that earlier. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34570467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34570467 Are you seriously unable to remember? If I say vaccines prevent infection, a vaccine conspiracy theorist will say, "B-b-but my friend got vaccinated, and she still got infected." That's why I added that qualification, not to say it is near 100%. That's on you and your silly vaccine conspiracy theory interpretations.