4 ms·

>Why are we live-tooting (ugh) our client's private disasters? Indeed. I'm glad they are, because it is fascinating but very odd. I'm sure it's not hard to ide

• guhidalg 4y ago
  I'm glad they are too. Let's take another example: what if the client was a healthcare provider and instead of us merely chuckling at the inconvenience of losses we witnessed deaths from management's incompetence. Would you still want the event to stay confidential if someone you knew died? I'm glad someone is discreetly share details of the situation to signal to the world "Hey if you fuck up compliance people can die, please don't do it like this" instead of keeping it confidential.
• LordDragonfang 4y ago
  >I'm sure it's not hard to identify the customer either. OP seems rather sure of the opposite: >But I felt I needed to address one particular concern that has been repeatedly raised. That of the identity of the company in question. >I’m a professional, and I’ve been doing this a long ol’ time. There is no way I’m going to risk the identity of the company, or my reputation, or the potential legal consequences for some interaction on social media. >So to clarify, enough details of the incident and those involved have been changed to protect their identity and everyone else involved. I am confident that you could work at the company involved and not even be aware this happened, even after reading this Partly due to scale and partly due to managerial secrecy.