> It is legally ruled that based on reckless behavior people are owed money. It is not necessary based on reckless behavior. Businesses often have strict liabi

> It is legally ruled that based on reckless behavior people are owed money. It is not necessary based on reckless behavior. Businesses often have strict liability, which means they are liable for damages even if they do everything right. It is a practical solution that simplifies legal cases (as proving regular liability would be harder) and also works as implicit insurance provided to customers. But it is fundamentally unjust and may be contraproductive in cases where it would destroy proper business or where legal costs markedly overwhelm compensation to damaged parties.