2 ms·
The exact wording really isn't the point, I see what you're saying but it's not what I intended - that's just the lack of a concrete example (something actually
by OJFord 4y ago
The exact wording really isn't the point, I see what you're saying but it's not what I intended - that's just the lack of a concrete example (something actually arcane and counter-intuitive) making it more difficult. I was imagining writing it from the perspective of 'this took a good bit of looking into why it didn't work like it looks like it should have'.
- scotty79 4y agoI'm not sure if it's accidental. Too much detail just sounds as if you not only fixed something but also lodged a formal complaint against whoever touched that place first. Technically it's good because it's very informative and probably noone will read it unless you, yourself made a mistake and the thing you fixed still doesn't work for some cases. Just sounds weird. But I'd still prefer it to "Added semicolon" for a commit diff that adds semicolon and nothing else. At minimum I'd like to see a link to a ticket that this change is supposed to solve.