3 ms·
Agreed. I worked on Graphene back in 2006 and it has been the 18m away from revolutionising everything ever since. The lack of a reliable, precise, bulk, manu
by LatteLazy 4y ago
Agreed.
I worked on Graphene back in 2006 and it has been the 18m away from revolutionising everything ever since. The lack of a reliable, precise, bulk, manufacturing process means so much of these results are basically just theoretical.
:(
- atonse 4y agoI remember reading a decade ago how they figured out how to create it by using sticky tape to pull up a single layer… what happened to that?
- MoreSEMI 4y agoUnfortunately, that is stochastic and will not be reproducible or result in yields anywhere close to acceptable to industry. There are methods to grow materials of the same class(TMDC) with CVD and the like, but apparently they don’t reach the quality of flakes that the tape method results in.
- dkqmduems 4y agoThis is a poor understanding of the scientific method.
- LatteLazy 4y agoMy comment is not about the scientific method.
- dkqmduems 4y agoYou claim many of the results remain theoretical. Are you familiar with the experimental validation of many of these results? That is certainly part of the scientific method.
- edgyquant 4y agoYou replied to a comment saying they had worked with the stuff with a ridiculous assertion that they misunderstood the scientific method. Learn social skills if you want to actually discuss something
- sroussey 4y agoWe should also figure out what do do with the stuff before it ends up in the ocean and landfills. Or at least what will happen when it’s there.