3 ms·

Only at the start for not reacting fast, and that was due to them getting fooled by the incessant propaganda that was coming from the US and the UK saying that

Only at the start for not reacting fast, and that was due to them getting fooled by the incessant propaganda that was coming from the US and the UK saying that 'there was no pandemic'. For months, the US state department and media lambasted China for 'exaggerating', that there was nothing to worry about and it was just a flu. https://i.imgur.com/0MNniYD.jpg https://i.imgur.com/0MNniYD.jpg They were doing this to protect the Western stock markets. All the Western European governments were totally deceived by this propaganda. Spain's government was the second one in Europe after Italy to take drastic measures and implement a quarantine. In an environment were nations started to backstab each other to acquire masks and pandemic supplies - like how the US robbed a lot of countries' supplies -... https://nypost.com/2020/04/04/us-accused-of-piracy-as-mask-shipment-diverts-from-germany/ https://nypost.com/2020/04/04/us-accused-of-piracy-as-mask-s... ... the Spanish government cooperated with other countries, foremost China, to take rapid action without backstabbing anyone. It immediately implemented economic measures to protect both people and businesses during the pandemic, diverting cash to small businesses, creating minimum income, postponing taxes and giving pandemic stimulus whereas the US and the UK etc literally hung out their people to dry in the pandemic. I'd say that Spain has been incredibly lucky to have entered the pandemic with this government. Many countries' people suffered a lot in the hands of 'free market' types, who openly declared that they would 'let the pandemic run its course' - to protect corporate tax breaks, of course - no need to spend money for the people. So aside from getting deceived by the US/UK at the start of the pandemic like every single Western European government, I'd say that this Spanish government has handled the pandemic in an exemplary fashion. That they were ALSO able to achieve some major reforms in the middle of a pandemic goes WAY beyond what anyone could expect...

gggggg5 4y ago
This would all be much more reasonable if literature genuinely supported lockdowns, but in reality it's a toss-up. Studies looking at quality-adjusted life years have not discovered a meaningful COVID-related benefit from the lockdowns. The most charitable takes will note that lockdowns did indeed drastically reduce traffic deaths, but it's hard to view that as a genuine pro-lockdown argument.
- unity1001 4y ago
  Lockdowns and masks worked in Asia since forever. They have been fighting outbreaks successfully in the past two decades. They worked for covid too. They 'did not work' in the US because certain circles wanted people to go back outside as fast as possible to bail out the sinking service sector and the stock market. This is without delving into the fact that the lockdowns' main objective was to prevent healthcare systems from choking. Spain had much more luck than any other European country since it has a high volume of trade with China and also had a left-wing government at the time, prompting and allowing China to come and set up a field hospital too boost hospital capacity in Madrid etc. But still, without lockdowns there was great risk as can be seen from what happened to the likes of the UK...
  - gggggg5 4y ago
    >But still, without lockdowns there was great risk as can be seen from what happened to the likes of the UK... Uh, what exactly happened in the UK?
    - unity1001 4y ago
      You have no idea how bad it was. Since everyone concentrated on their own issues, little news of the state of other countries made it into other countries' press. First, British Tories (the conservative free market types) denied that any pandemic existed. They kept the country open still after Italy, Spain started their lockdowns. They said they would go for 'herd immunity'. Ie, let those who will die die out. After much protest they started a quarantine. Even when they started the quarantine, it was limited at the start. They said it was 'okay' because covid affected mostly the elderly. (so not a problem for 'the economy'). Then things got really bad and they started a lockdown. In which they left everyone fend for themselves. No support like how the Spanish government gave to the businesses and the people. During the quarantine they totally ignored and hush-hushed what happened in retirement homes. Its unknown how many died there. I think there was a lawsuit resulting from that. Then they rushed to open early for the sake of 'the economy', saying that 'herd immunity' would take care of the problem (again). During all this time they were privatizing their social healthcare system, the NHS by defunding it and selling parts of it to US corporations. So at the end of the quarantine when the new waves started, the NHS was flooded and under capacity. They started overworking the underpaid doctors and nurses to the point of breaking. Now even with the strikes the government refuses to pay them more or fund the health system more and instead is planning on laws to prevent the strikes. It is said that an unprecedented number of people are dying as a result of the defunding and privatization of the NHS. People cant even get ambulances. There arent hospital beds and so on. https://eand.co/welcome-to-dickensian-britain-97bf9e7fe93a https://eand.co/welcome-to-dickensian-britain-97bf9e7fe93a https://eand.co/why-britains-nhs-is-dying-and-why-it-s-a-warning-to-the-world-b83300d92aa6 https://eand.co/why-britains-nhs-is-dying-and-why-it-s-a-war... What the Brits are doing to themselves through these Toff governments defies description.

gggggg5 4y ago

This would all be much more reasonable if literature genuinely supported lockdowns, but in reality it's a toss-up. Studies looking at quality-adjusted life years have not discovered a meaningful COVID-related benefit from the lockdowns. The most charitable takes will note that lockdowns did indeed drastically reduce traffic deaths, but it's hard to view that as a genuine pro-lockdown argument.

unity1001 4y ago
Lockdowns and masks worked in Asia since forever. They have been fighting outbreaks successfully in the past two decades. They worked for covid too. They 'did not work' in the US because certain circles wanted people to go back outside as fast as possible to bail out the sinking service sector and the stock market. This is without delving into the fact that the lockdowns' main objective was to prevent healthcare systems from choking. Spain had much more luck than any other European country since it has a high volume of trade with China and also had a left-wing government at the time, prompting and allowing China to come and set up a field hospital too boost hospital capacity in Madrid etc. But still, without lockdowns there was great risk as can be seen from what happened to the likes of the UK...
- gggggg5 4y ago
  >But still, without lockdowns there was great risk as can be seen from what happened to the likes of the UK... Uh, what exactly happened in the UK?
  - unity1001 4y ago
    You have no idea how bad it was. Since everyone concentrated on their own issues, little news of the state of other countries made it into other countries' press. First, British Tories (the conservative free market types) denied that any pandemic existed. They kept the country open still after Italy, Spain started their lockdowns. They said they would go for 'herd immunity'. Ie, let those who will die die out. After much protest they started a quarantine. Even when they started the quarantine, it was limited at the start. They said it was 'okay' because covid affected mostly the elderly. (so not a problem for 'the economy'). Then things got really bad and they started a lockdown. In which they left everyone fend for themselves. No support like how the Spanish government gave to the businesses and the people. During the quarantine they totally ignored and hush-hushed what happened in retirement homes. Its unknown how many died there. I think there was a lawsuit resulting from that. Then they rushed to open early for the sake of 'the economy', saying that 'herd immunity' would take care of the problem (again). During all this time they were privatizing their social healthcare system, the NHS by defunding it and selling parts of it to US corporations. So at the end of the quarantine when the new waves started, the NHS was flooded and under capacity. They started overworking the underpaid doctors and nurses to the point of breaking. Now even with the strikes the government refuses to pay them more or fund the health system more and instead is planning on laws to prevent the strikes. It is said that an unprecedented number of people are dying as a result of the defunding and privatization of the NHS. People cant even get ambulances. There arent hospital beds and so on. https://eand.co/welcome-to-dickensian-britain-97bf9e7fe93a https://eand.co/welcome-to-dickensian-britain-97bf9e7fe93a https://eand.co/why-britains-nhs-is-dying-and-why-it-s-a-warning-to-the-world-b83300d92aa6 https://eand.co/why-britains-nhs-is-dying-and-why-it-s-a-war... What the Brits are doing to themselves through these Toff governments defies description.