3 ms·

> ...except that now you've also foolishly thrown away a chance to be friendly with her in a way more natural fashion... Making way too many assumptions, to in

by Tozen 4y ago

> ...except that now you've also foolishly thrown away a chance to be friendly with her in a way more natural fashion... Making way too many assumptions, to include interjecting personal beliefs on how other adults should or are suppose to meet. These are adults, that have the right to choose how they want to approach and interact with each other, as long as its consenting and legal. It also comes off as a denial of agency and choice of the adult women involved, as if they can't freely decide to enter a relationship or not. Thus we have 3rd parties wishing to involve themselves, where arguably they should not be placing themselves, to attempt to decide for them (interloping teacher or college) by villainizing or criminalizing the male students. Which at the end of the day, is actually what's wrong.

zozbot234 4y ago
No, the burden is on those who endorse this silly, obnoxious private tutoring stuff to justify their assumption that it's a good way to get to know people (including but not limited to, in a romantic fashion). You're in a majority female class that you chose specifically for that fact about it, and you can't get your fellow students' attention without ruining the class as an educational experience for everyone else? I'm sorry but that just doesn't seem plausible or right.
- lelanthran 4y ago
  > No, the burden is on those who endorse this silly, obnoxious private tutoring stuff Actually, no. If you want to ban stuff or stop an activity between two consensual adults, you better have a damn good reason, other than it offends me!