>I have no idea how someone could not convincingly accept that. So you mean that to you it's so obvious that shariah leads to peace that you have trouble under

>I have no idea how someone could not convincingly accept that. So you mean that to you it's so obvious that shariah leads to peace that you have trouble understanding how someone might disagree? Then I assume that you completely agree with all aspects of shariah, right? Then why would achieving peace require killing homosexuals and apostates? Are those two specific groups particularly violent? It seems to me that killing is quite a violent act, so homosexuals and apostates would have to be really violent to justify outright killing them.