>exploit That's a really funny use of the word, considering that the whole purpose of what they're trying to do is the opposite of exploit those of lesser mean

>exploit That's a really funny use of the word, considering that the whole purpose of what they're trying to do is the opposite of exploit those of lesser means. If you can explain to me how what they're trying to do is going to is by definition of the word "exploit" then I will change my mind, otherwise otherwise I will continue to think you have no idea how ironic it is for someone offering an equivalent service or something that will be the equivalent service for a much lower cost as "exploiting someone." It seems like the legal industry doesn't like competition.