> He just wants to surround himself with a higher percentage of people that he is sexually attracted to. This statement comes across as a bit misandric, but in

> He just wants to surround himself with a higher percentage of people that he is sexually attracted to. This statement comes across as a bit misandric, but in way in which it appears not to be realized. It's demonizing males who are attracted to the opposite sex, which is natural biology, and as if men shouldn't be allowed to freely associate with other adults of the opposite sex. On the flip, I don't see women being demonized for wanting to be around a higher percentage of people she is sexually attracted to. Be it males or other females. To include if she chose a class or major with higher prospects for meeting the opposite sex, dating, or for greater marriage prospects. > The average hypothetical man choosing his class or major because of how many women are in it isn't looking to make female friends. Again, the casual male demonization and vilification, is both sad and amazing. Few people would come to the conclusion that a woman choosing her class or major based on greater opportunities with the opposite or same sex, would find that to be nefarious by default. > If you are someone who genuinely enjoys the company of women over the company of men, then I agree that it is not misogynistic. The later statements contradict this statement. It also appears that for a male to genuinely enjoy the company of women is something weird or odd. Why can't an adult prefer to be around other adults that they want to associate with. There are many women that state they prefer male friends to female friends. That's their preference or personality, nothing nefarious should be read into it, without evidence.