So, skipping over the 'tune fs'[0] for a ["lexx !yacc"] | ['less is more'] | [less filling]/[tastes great] programming might be more clear after things such as

So, skipping over the 'tune fs'[0] for a ["lexx !yacc"] | ['less is more'] | [less filling]/[tastes great] programming might be more clear after things such as [1] as long as OpenAI forms not used. Or perhaps not, if strange loops are a haskell [2]. But clear understandings of diffferent ways to think about language construction/programming can be found at [3][4][5] without resorting to non-math/computer science language construction/programming via Linguistics / Humanities field(s)[6][7]. [0] "You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish" : https://unixhistory.livejournal.com/1808.html https://unixhistory.livejournal.com/1808.html? [1] EGB : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach [2] : Lob and mob: stange loops in Haskell (2015) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34578411 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34578411 [3] Esoteric.codes : https://esoteric.codes/ https://esoteric.codes/ [4] https://esolangs.org/wiki/Language_list https://esolangs.org/wiki/Language_list [5] A Brief Introduction to Esoteric Programming Languages' : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27206055 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27206055 [6] : "Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages"by Guy Deutscher [7] : "In the Land of Invented Languages: Adventures in Linguistic Creativity, Madness, and Genius" by Arika Okrent