3 ms·
Agreed, but I would probably still be programming in C++ if the tooling weren’t so bad, irrespective of the expressiveness. That said, I’m glad Rust is expressi
by throwaway894345 4y ago
Agreed, but I would probably still be programming in C++ if the tooling weren’t so bad, irrespective of the expressiveness. That said, I’m glad Rust is expressive, but more glad that it picked a coherent set of language features—it feels much less cobbled together than C++ if only for the benefit of hindsight.