> I think you might be underestimating how different package management is between Debian, Arch, and Fedora Doesn't that make all of the efforts spent maintain

> I think you might be underestimating how different package management is between Debian, Arch, and Fedora Doesn't that make all of the efforts spent maintaining separate package managers even worse? It's bikeshedding/hairsplitting at some point, no? I'm talking about developing + maintaining yum/apt/pacman Let alone what it takes to maintain 20,000+ (or however many the real number is) packages shipped slightly differently for each repo