3 ms·
>So just to establish: You would be okay with someone say, joining a company with the explicit purpose of dating and not doing their work, yeah? Getting a job
by ShredKazoo 4y ago
>So just to establish: You would be okay with someone say, joining a company with the explicit purpose of dating and not doing their work, yeah?
Getting a job and then not doing your work makes you a shitty employee, and being a shitty employee is bad. You're violating the spirit of your employment contract, that your employer gives you money and you do work for them in return.
- fzeroracer 4y agoCorrect, now apply that to being a student. When you go to college, there is a contract that you sign to not cheat, to not be disruptive. To be a 'good' student (which doesn't necessarily entail passing classes, but not affecting others or being dishonest). Guess what these people are doing in this situation.
- ShredKazoo 4y ago>When you go to college, there is a contract that you sign to not cheat, to not be disruptive. Cheating isn't relevant when you're auditing a class. I think the key issue is how disruptive the behavior really is. My suspicion is that it isn't very disruptive and the people complaining are being oversensitive.
- fzeroracer 4y agoSo you're going to continue dancing around the point I'm making. I believe we're done here then since you've planted your feet at the 'it's not disruptive even if people are saying it's disruptive' line.
- ShredKazoo 4y agoYep, just because people say it is disruptive doesn't make it disruptive. Imagine a gay couple sits together in class every day -- no PDA, but it's obvious they're a couple. Students complain to the professor that they're being disruptive. What is the appropriate response? If they're consenting adults engaging in activities that are mutually consensual, generally speaking I don't think there is a problem.