3 ms·
Your original comment suggests you are proposing: [class action identifier].settlements.gov Parent is asking why not: settlements.gov/[class action identifie
by ratorx 4y ago
Your original comment suggests you are proposing:
[class action identifier].settlements.gov
Parent is asking why not:
settlements.gov/[class action identifier]
Using a different page rather than subdomain wouldn’t have any real phishing downsides and would avoid polluting DNS entirely, so seems better.
- ec109685 4y agoWildcard can avoid the dns polluting. The domain prefix stands out a bit more and let’s them have their own cookies.
- aliqot 4y agoI didn't consider the lets them have their own cookies part, but I kinda like it, however I don't really know why other than I like separations of concerns. Why do you prefer that, and what scenarios have necessitated that in the past if you don't mind me asking?
- zinekeller 4y agoActual reason: because there are different firms administering these settlements. You want to separate these by subdomain so that there isn't a chance that an administrator from one site hijacking into another. Unless you're proposing the government to directly call/mail affected persons (might be desirable in cases like the JnJ Talc powder case where it is clearly a retail case).
- aliqot 4y agoAh that's a great reason, thanks. It helps when you framed it up in current events, really made sense.
- ceejayoz 4y agoI don’t want the gov building and hosting the sites; I just want CNAMEs pointing at the law firms’ sites.