> the way we define intelligence is such that if we find or invent something that combats human intelligence we immediately redefine it to exclude that aspect.

> the way we define intelligence is such that if we find or invent something that combats human intelligence we immediately redefine it to exclude that aspect. And what makes you so sure the opposite won't happen? E.g. GAI will be achieved earlier by excluding some aspect of human intelligence that some people deem essential. The whole "problem" is that we can't agree on what constitutes intelligence. I predict that it won't be long before AI systems can score 200 on standard IQ tests.